> A few weeks ago I skewered NRO's legal analyst Ed Whelan for trying
> to spin Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas as being "neutral" on the right
> to choose.
You "skewered" them? Is this your objective, unbiased view? Or your
self-promoting, overconfident view?
I know you think you're great; please try to leave it to the reader to
decide if they think so too. Otherwise you just sound lame, to your
supporters and detractors alike.
Again, I generally agree with your views. I just generally disagree
with how you communicate them.